Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 69
Filter
1.
Ophthalmol Ther ; 13(5): 1071-1102, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38526804

ABSTRACT

Despite advances in systemic care, diabetic disease of the eye (DDE) remains the leading cause of blindness worldwide. There is a critical gap of up-to-date, evidence-based guidance for ophthalmologists in Canada that includes evidence from recent randomized controlled trials. Previous guidance has not always given special consideration to applying treatments and managing DDE in the context of the healthcare system. This consensus statement aims to assist practitioners in the field by providing a spectrum of acceptable opinions on DDE treatment and management from recognized experts in the field. In compiling evidence and generating consensus, a working group of retinal specialists in Canada addressed clinical questions surrounding the four themes of disease, patient, management, and collaboration. The working group reviewed literature representing the highest level of evidence on DDE and shared their opinions on topics surrounding the epidemiology and pathophysiology of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema; diagnosis and monitoring; considerations around diabetes medication use; strategic considerations for management given systemic comorbidities, ocular comorbidities, and pregnancy; treatment goals and modalities for diabetic macular edema, non-proliferative and proliferative diabetic retinopathy, and retinal detachment; and interdisciplinary collaboration. Ultimately, this work highlighted that the retinal examination in DDE not only informs the treating ophthalmologist but can serve as a global index for disease progression across many tissues of the body. It highlighted further that DDE can be treated regardless of diabetic control, that a systemic approach to patient care will result in the best health outcomes, and prevention of visual complications requires a multidisciplinary management approach. Ophthalmologists must tailor their clinical approach to the needs and circumstances of individual patients and work within the realities of their healthcare setting.

2.
CMAJ Open ; 11(6): E1125-E1134, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38052477

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Diabetes, a leading cause of visual impairment, is on the rise in Canada. We assessed trends in the prevalence of visual impairment among people in Canada with and without diabetes to inform the development of strategies and policies for the management of visual impairment. METHODS: We analyzed self-reported data from respondents aged 45 years and older in 7 cycles of nationwide surveys (National Population Health Survey and Canadian Community Health Survey) from 1994/95 to 2013/14. The age- and sex-standardized prevalence of visual impairment was calculated. We assessed comparisons by levels of education and income, using sex-standardized prevalence owing to sparse data. RESULTS: Among people in Canada with diabetes, the age- and sex-standardized prevalence of visual impairment was 7.37% (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.31%-9.43%) in 1994/95 and 1996/97 combined, decreasing to 3.03% (95% CI 2.48%-3.57%) in 2013/14, giving a standardized prevalence ratio of 0.41 (95% CI 0.30-0.56) comparing 2013/14 with 1994/95 and 1996/97 combined. Among people in Canada without diabetes, visual impairment prevalence decreased from 3.72% (95% CI 3.31%-4.14%) in 1994/95 and 1996/97 combined to 1.69% (95% CI 1.52%-1.87%) in 2013/14, with a standardized prevalence ratio of 0.45 (95% CI 0.40-0.52). Decreased sex-standardized prevalence of visual impairment was observed among people with high and low education levels and incomes among those with and without diabetes. INTERPRETATION: Visual impairment prevalence was roughly 2 times higher among those with versus without diabetes in all survey years; from 1994 to 2014, visual impairment prevalence decreased among those with and without diabetes irrespective of education and income levels. These results suggest effective collective efforts by clinicians, researchers, the public and government.

3.
Can J Diabetes ; 2023 Nov 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37944665

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Although insulin production is reportedly retained in many people with longstanding type 1 diabetes (T1D), the magnitude and relevance of connecting peptide (C-peptide) production are uncertain. In this study, we aimed to define fasted C-peptide distributions and associated clinical factors. METHODS: In a cross-sectional analysis of the Canadian Study of Longevity, fasted serum and urinary C-peptide was measured in 74 patients with longstanding T1D (duration ≥50 years) and 75 age- and sex-matched controls. Extensive phenotyping for complications was performed and patient-reported variables were included. C-peptide distributions were analyzed, and multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the variable association in T1D participants. RESULTS: The 74 T1D participants had a mean age 66±8 years, a disease duration of 54 (interquartile range 52 to 58) years, and a glycated hemoglobin (A1C) of 7.4±0.8% (56.8±9.15 mmol/mol). The 75 controls had a mean age of 65±8 years and an A1C of 5.7±0.4% (38.4±4.05 mmol/mol). Participants with T1D had lower fasted serum C-peptide than controls (0.013±0.022 vs 1.595±1.099 nmol/L, p<0.001). Of the T1D participants, C-peptide was detectable in 30 of 73 (41%) serum samples, 32 of 74 (43%) urine samples, and in 48 of 74 (65%) for either serum or urine. The variables independently associated with detectable serum or urinary C-peptide were lower total daily insulin requirement (odds ratio 2.351 [for 1 lower unit/kg], p=0.013) and lower hypoglycemia worry score (odds ratio 1.059 [for 1 point lower on the worry subscore of the Hypoglycemia Fear Survey], p=0.030). CONCLUSIONS: Although detectable C-peptide in longstanding diabetes was common, the magnitude of concentration was extremely low when compared with age- and sex-matched controls. Despite minimal detectability, its presence is validated by lower insulin requirements and strongly associated with lower hypoglycemia worry.

4.
Pilot Feasibility Stud ; 9(1): 158, 2023 Sep 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37689724

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Diabetic retinopathy is a leading cause of preventable blindness in Canada. Clinical guidelines recommend annual diabetic retinopathy screening for people living with diabetes to reduce the risk and progression of vision loss. However, many Canadians with diabetes do not attend screening. Screening rates are even lower in immigrants to Canada including people from China, Africa, and the Caribbean, and these groups are also at higher risk of developing diabetes complications. We aim to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and fidelity of a co-developed, linguistically and culturally tailored tele-retinopathy screening intervention for Mandarin-speaking immigrants from China and French-speaking immigrants from African-Caribbean countries living with diabetes in Ottawa, Canada, and identify how many from each population group attend screening during the pilot period. METHODS: We will work with our health system and patient partners to conduct a 6-month feasibility pilot of a tele-retinopathy screening intervention in a Community Health Centre in Ottawa. We anticipate recruiting 50-150 patients and 5-10 health care providers involved in delivering the intervention for the pilot. Acceptability will be assessed via a Theoretical Framework of Acceptability-informed survey with patients and health care providers. To assess feasibility, we will use a Theoretical Domains Framework-informed interview guide and to assess fidelity, and we will use a survey informed by the National Institutes of Health framework from the perspective of health care providers. We will also collect patient demographics (i.e., age, gender, ethnicity, health insurance status, and immigration information), screening outcomes (i.e., patients with retinopathy identified, patients requiring specialist care), patient costs, and other intervention-related variables such as preferred language. Survey data will be descriptively analyzed and qualitative data will undergo content analysis. DISCUSSION: This feasibility pilot study will capture how many people living with diabetes from each group attend the diabetic retinopathy screening, costs, and implementation processes for the tele-retinopathy screening intervention. The study will indicate the practicability and suitability of the intervention in increasing screening attendance in the target population groups. The study results will inform a patient-randomized trial, provide evidence to conduct an economic evaluation of the intervention, and optimize the community-based intervention.

6.
Can J Ophthalmol ; 2023 Apr 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37023796

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To characterize patients referred for diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening in a unique multidisciplinary diabetes care clinic at a tertiary care centre. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted involving patients who were referred to the Cardiac and Renal Endocrine Clinic at a tertiary care centre (University Health Network) for DR screening between April 2019-March 2020 and November 2020-August 2021. Patients' demographics; micro- and macrovascular disease measurements; visual acuity, intraocular pressure, fundus imaging, and optical coherence tomography results were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 64 patients who attended the clinic, 21 patients (33%) with type 2 diabetes had on-site DR screening. The remaining 43 patients had DR screening within 6 months of the appointment or were under ophthalmology care with annual screening visits elsewhere. Of the 21 patients who underwent retinopathy screening, 7 patients (33%) had DR: 4 had mild nonproliferative DR, 2 had moderate nonproliferative DR, 1 had proliferative DR, and 1 had macular edema. Patients with DR had a significantly longer diabetes duration than patients without DR (24.5 ± 10.2 years vs 12.5 ± 5.8 years; p = 0.0247). No significant differences were observed in glycemic control, blood pressure, lipid profiles, kidney function, visual acuity, or intraocular pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggests a potential benefit of integrated DR screening in patients with long-standing diabetes as part of a multidisciplinary diabetes care clinic to diagnose and manage DR. Future work is needed to further develop such clinics and investigate their long-term effect on patient outcomes.

7.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 23(1): 302, 2023 Mar 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36991464

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Diabetic retinopathy is a sight-threatening ocular complication of diabetes. Screening is an effective way to reduce severe complications, but screening attendance rates are often low, particularly for newcomers and immigrants to Canada and people from cultural and linguistic minority groups. Building on previous work, in partnership with patient and health system stakeholders, we co-developed a linguistically and culturally tailored tele-retinopathy screening intervention for people living with diabetes who recently immigrated to Canada from either China or African-Caribbean countries. METHODS: Following an environmental scan of diabetes eye care pathways in Ottawa, we conducted co-development workshops using a nominal group technique to create and prioritize personas of individuals requiring screening and identify barriers to screening that each persona may face. Next, we used the Theoretical Domains Framework to categorize the barriers/enablers and then mapped these categories to potential evidence-informed behaviour change techniques. Finally with these techniques in mind, participants prioritized strategies and channels of delivery, developed intervention content, and clarified actions required by different actors to overcome anticipated intervention delivery barriers. RESULTS: We carried out iterative co-development workshops with Mandarin and French-speaking individuals living with diabetes (i.e., patients in the community) who immigrated to Canada from China and African-Caribbean countries (n = 13), patient partners (n = 7), and health system partners (n = 6) recruited from community health centres in Ottawa. Patients in the community co-development workshops were conducted in Mandarin or French. Together, we prioritized five barriers to attending diabetic retinopathy screening: language (TDF Domains: skills, social influences), retinopathy familiarity (knowledge, beliefs about consequences), physician barriers regarding communication for screening (social influences), lack of publicity about screening (knowledge, environmental context and resources), and fitting screening around other activities (environmental context and resources). The resulting intervention included the following behaviour change techniques to address prioritized local barriers: information about health consequence, providing instructions on how to attend screening, prompts/cues, adding objects to the environment, social support, and restructuring the social environment. Operationalized delivery channels incorporated language support, pre-booking screening and sending reminders, social support via social media and community champions, and providing using flyers and videos as delivery channels. CONCLUSION: Working with intervention users and stakeholders, we co-developed a culturally and linguistically relevant tele-retinopathy intervention to address barriers to attending diabetic retinopathy screening and increase uptake among two under-served groups.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Retinopathy , Emigrants and Immigrants , Humans , Diabetic Retinopathy/diagnosis , Canada , Linguistics , Caribbean Region
8.
J Med Internet Res ; 25: e37867, 2023 01 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36630160

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Vision loss from diabetic-related retinopathy (DR) is preventable through regular screening. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to test different patient engagement approaches to expand a teleophthalmology program at a primary care clinic in the city of Toronto, Canada. METHODS: A teleophthalmology program was set up in a large, urban, academic, team-based primary care practice. Patients older than 18 years with type 1 or type 2 diabetes were randomized to one of the following 4 engagement strategies: phone call, mail, mail plus phone call, or usual care. Outreach was conducted by administrative staff within the clinic. The primary outcome was booking an appointment for DR screening. RESULTS: A total of 23 patients in the phone, 28 in the mail, 32 in the mail plus phone call, and 27 in the control (usual care) group were included in the analysis. After the intervention and after excluding patients who said they were screened, 88% (15/17) of patients in the phone, 11% (2/18) in the mail, and 100% (21/21) in the mail and phone group booked an appointment with the teleophthalmology program compared to 0% (0/12) in the control group. Phoning patients positively predicted patients booking a teleophthalmology appointment (P<.001), whereas mailing a letter had no effect. CONCLUSIONS: Patient engagement to book DR screening via teleophthalmology in an urban, academic, team-based primary care practice using telephone calls was much more effective than patient engagement using letters or usual care. Practices that have access to a local DR screening program and have resources for such engagement strategies should consider using them as a means to improve their DR screening rates. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03927859; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03927859.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Diabetic Retinopathy , Ophthalmology , Telemedicine , Humans , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnosis , Prospective Studies , Diabetic Retinopathy/diagnosis , Telephone , Mass Screening , Primary Health Care
9.
Can J Ophthalmol ; 58(4): 278-286, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35577027

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the population-level predictors for being unscreened for diabetic retinopathy (DR) among individuals with diabetes in a developed country. DESIGN: A retrospective population-based repeated-cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: All individuals with diabetes (types 1 and 2) aged ≥20 years in the universal health care system in Ontario were identified in the 2011-2013 and 2017-2019 time periods. METHODS: The Mantel-Haenszel test was used for the relative risk (RR) comparison of subcategories stratified by the 2 cross-sectional time periods. RESULTS: A total of 1 145 645 and 1 346 578 individuals with diabetes were identified in 2011-2013 and 2017-2019, respectively. The proportion of patients unscreened for DR declined very slightly from 35% (n = 405 967) in 2011-2013 to 34% (n = 455 027) in 2017-2019 of the population with diabetes (RR = 0.967; 95% CI, 0.964-0.9693; p < 0.0001). Young adults aged 20-39 years of age had the highest proportion of unscreened patients (62% and 58% in 2011-2013 and 2017-2019, respectively). Additionally, those who had a lower income quintile (RR = 1.039; 95% CI, 1.036-1.044; p < 0.0001), were recent immigrants (RR = 1.286; 95% CI, 1.280-1.293; p < 0.0001), lived in urban areas (RR = 1.149; 95% CI, 1.145-1.154; p < 0.0001), had a mental health history (RR = 1.117; 95% CI, 1.112-1.122; p < 0.0001), or lacked a connection to a primary care provider (RR = 1.656; 95% CI, 1.644-1.668; p < 0.0001) had a higher risk of being unscreened. CONCLUSIONS: This population-based study suggests that over 1 decade, 33% of individuals with diabetes are unscreened for DR, and young age, low income, immigration, residing in a large city, mental health illness, and no primary care access are the main predictors.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Retinopathy , Mental Disorders , Young Adult , Humans , Adult , Diabetic Retinopathy/diagnosis , Diabetic Retinopathy/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology
10.
J Diabetes Complications ; 36(11): 108320, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36201892

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To determine the relationship between renal hemodynamic function and neuropathy in adults with ≥50-years of type 1 diabetes (T1D) compared to nondiabetic controls. METHODS: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR, inulin), effective renal plasma flow (ERPF, p-aminohippurate), modified Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score (mTCNS), corneal confocal microscopy, nerve conduction, and heart rate variability (autonomic function) were measured; afferent (RA) and efferent (RE) arteriolar resistances were estimated using the Gomez equations in 74 participants with T1D and in 75 controls. Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) non-resistors were defined by eGFRMDRD < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 or 24-h urine albumin excretion >30 mg/day. Linear regression was applied to examine the relationships between renal function (dependent variable) and neuropathy measures (independent variable), adjusted for age, sex, HbA1c, systolic blood pressure, low density lipoprotein cholesterol, and 24-h urine albumin to creatinine ratio. RESULTS: Higher mTCNS associated with lower renal blood flow (ß ± SE:-9.29 ± 4.20, p = 0.03) and greater RE (ß ± SE:32.97 ± 15.43, p = 0.04) in participants with T1D, but not in controls. DKD non-resistors had a higher mTCNS and worse measures of corneal nerve morphology compared to those without DKD. Renal hemodynamic parameters did not associate with autonomic nerve function. CONCLUSIONS: Although neurological dysfunction in the presence of diabetes may contribute to impaired renal blood flow resulting in ischemic injury in patients with T1D, early autonomic dysfunction does not appear to be associated with kidney function changes.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Diabetic Nephropathies , Adult , Humans , Longevity/physiology , Canada/epidemiology , Hemodynamics/physiology , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Albumins
11.
Can J Diabetes ; 2022 Mar 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35985924

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Teleophthalmology has improved diabetic retinopathy screening, and should be expanded in urban areas, where most unscreened individuals reside. In this study we explored facilitators and barriers of teleophthalmology in primary care settings in Toronto, Canada. METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 7 health-care providers and 7 individuals with diabetes to explore their perspectives of teleophthalmology in urban primary care settings. Interview data were analyzed using interpretive thematic analysis to generate themes. RESULTS: Six themes were identified. Facilitators included patient-centred implementation, access to teleophthalmology at primary care sites and patients' trust in their providers' recommendations. Barriers included patients' lack of understanding of diabetic retinopathy and the health-care system, providers' lack of interest and the need to streamline administrative processes. CONCLUSIONS: Although teleophthalmology was well-received by patients, there was limited interest from primary care providers. Strategies for increasing uptake include increasing primary care providers' awareness of teleophthalmology's value in urban centres, improving administrative processes and centralizing patient recruitment.

12.
Retina ; 42(7): 1219-1230, 2022 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35483036

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To review predictive factors of spontaneous vitreomacular traction (VMT) release. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed on Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Studies comparing spontaneously released VMT to persistent VMT were included. A meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model, and weighted mean difference, risk ratio (RR), and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were reported as appropriate. RESULTS: Of a search of 258 studies, 12 studies were included, from which 272 of 934 eyes (29%) underwent spontaneous release. Mean age was 70.0 years, 37.2% of patients were men, and mean follow-up was 22.0 months. Significant predictive factors for spontaneous release were smaller VMT diameter (n = 177; weighted mean difference = -212.48 µm, 95% CI = [-417.36, -7.60], P = 0.04), epiretinal membrane absence (n = 162; RR = 2.17, 95% CI = [1.18, 3.97], P = 0.01), and right eye involvement (n = 76; RR = 2.10, 95% CI = [1.14, 3.88], P = 0.02). Nonsignificant factors were age, initial best-corrected visual acuity, sex, ocular comorbidity, fellow-eye posterior vitreous detachment, previous intravitreal injection, and VMT classification with focal defined as ≤400 µm. Mean release time was 15.3 months (n = 212). Mean best-corrected visual acuity improved from 0.34 ± 0.21 (Snellen 20/44) to 0.20 ± 0.58 logMAR (Snellen 20/32) postrelease (n = 121). CONCLUSION: Smaller VMT diameter, epiretinal membrane absence, and right eye involvement may support spontaneous VMT release. If patients have tolerable symptoms, clinicians may consider observation in patients with these predictive factors.


Subject(s)
Epiretinal Membrane , Vitreous Detachment , Aged , Female , Humans , Intravitreal Injections , Male , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, Optical Coherence , Vision Disorders , Visual Acuity , Vitreous Detachment/diagnosis , Vitreous Detachment/drug therapy
13.
BMJ Open Ophthalmol ; 7(1): e000915, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35237724

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of teleretinal screening compared with face-to-face examination for detection of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (PRISMA-DTA). A comprehensive search of OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane CENTRAL was performed from January 2010 to July 2021. QUADAS-2 tool was used to assess methodological quality and applicability of the studies. A bivariate random effects model was used to perform the meta-analysis. Referrable DR was defined as any disease severity equal to or worse than moderate non-proliferative DR or diabetic macular oedema (DMO). RESULTS: 28 articles were included. Teleretinal screening achieved a sensitivity of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.82 to 0.96) and specificity of 0.88 (0.74 to 0.95) for any DR (13 studies, n=7207, Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) low). Accuracy for referrable DR (10 studies, n=6373, GRADE moderate) was lower with a sensitivity of 0.88 (0.81 to 0.93) and specificity of 0.86 (0.79 to 0.90). After exclusion of ungradable images, the specificity for referrable DR increased to 0.95 (0.90 to 0.98), while the sensitivity remained nearly unchanged at 0.85 (0.76 to 0.91). Teleretinal screening achieved a sensitivity of 0.71 (0.49 to 0.86) and specificity of 0.88 (0.85 to 0.90) for detection of AMD (three studies, n=697, GRADE low). CONCLUSION: Teleretinal screening is highly accurate for detecting any DR and DR warranting referral. Data for AMD screening is promising but warrants further investigation. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020191994.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Retinopathy , Macular Degeneration , Macular Edema , Diabetic Retinopathy/diagnosis , Humans , Macular Degeneration/diagnosis , Macular Edema/diagnosis , Mass Screening/methods , Referral and Consultation
14.
J Diabetes Complications ; 36(3): 108134, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35123866

ABSTRACT

AIM: Physical activity (PA) is recommended to improve glycemic control in T1D; however, the effect of PA on distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSPN) and cardiac autonomic function in longstanding T1D is unknown. METHODS: Data from 75 participants were collected as part of the Canadian Study of Longevity in T1D. Participants completed a physical exam, medical history, extensive complications phenotyping and reported their daily PA from the preceding 12-months. Pearson and Spearman correlations were used to assess PA time and complications variables. Linear regression was used to test associations between PA time, neurological and electrophysiological measures. Univariable regression was used to indicate the change in the given independent variables associated with a 30-min increase in PA per week. RESULTS: Participants were 66 ± 8 years old with diabetes duration of 54 [52,58] years, HbA1c was 7.3 ± 0.8, 65(89%) had DSPN. Weekly PA time was 156 ± 132 min, and 35(47%) reported ≧150 min/week. Participants with DSPN reported lower PA time compared to individuals without DSPN (141 ± 124 min/week vs. 258 ± 129 min/week; p = 0.015). PA time was associated with better cooling detection threshold (r = 0.24; p = 0.043), peroneal and sural amplitude (r = 0.36; p = 0.0017, rs = 0.26; p = 0.024) and conduction velocity (rs = 0.28; p = 0.015, r = 0.23; p = 0.050). Linear regression adjusting for age and HbA1c, showed that for each 30-min of PA there was a 0.09mv higher peroneal amplitude (p = 0.032) and 0.048 ms lower peroneal F-wave latency (p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: In longstanding T1D, PA time is associated with superior large nerve fibre function in the lower limbs and some better measures of small nerve fibre function.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 , Diabetic Neuropathies , Aged , Canada/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/complications , Exercise , Humans , Longevity , Middle Aged
15.
J Vitreoretin Dis ; 6(3): 214-220, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37008555

ABSTRACT

Purpose: This work reports a rare case of spontaneous suprachoroidal hemorrhage (SSCH) and summarizes the literature on its treatment options and outcomes. Methods: A case report and comprehensive literature review are presented on the medical and surgical management of SSCH on PubMed from 1998 to 2021. Results: The literature search revealed 58 studies, 33 of which included 52 eyes of 47 patients. Surgical treatment typically consisted of choroidal drainage with posterior sclerotomies combined with pars plana vitrectomy and silicone oil placement. Medical therapy involved intraocular pressure control with laser peripheral iridotomy and topical, oral, and intravenous medication. Conclusions: In cases of SSCH, conservative management and a prompt workup should be initiated to identify the cause before proceeding with surgery. If the initial workup does not reveal a cause, medical and surgical treatments are both viable and the decision is at the discretion of the treating physician.

16.
Can J Ophthalmol ; 57(5): 319-327, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34174215

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: In 2004, government-funded routine eye exams were discontinued for individuals aged 20-64 years in Ontario. We assessed whether this policy change reduced the rate of new glaucoma diagnoses. DESIGN: Cohort-based time-series analysis. PARTICIPANTS: Ontarians aged 20+ years in 2000-2014. METHODS: Province-wide physician billing data were analyzed using segmented regression analysis. New glaucoma diagnoses were defined as the first glaucoma diagnostic billing code submitted by an ophthalmologist or optometrist among Ontarians who did not visit an ophthalmologist or an optometrist in the year prior to the study year. RESULTS: Post- versus pre-2004, the rate of new glaucoma billings was reduced in all age groups: -2.7‰ (p < 0.0001) in the age group 20-39 years, -8.2‰ (p < 0.0001) in the age group 40-64 years (p < 0.0001), and -2.1‰ (p = 0.0003) in the age group 65+ years. This corresponds to a decreased number of individuals with a new glaucoma billing after 2004 versus before 2004: -8,800 (p < 0.001) in the age group 20-39 years, -32,234 (p < 0.0001) in the age group 40-64 years, and -3,255 (p = 0.0012) in the age group 65+ years. Reduced rates of new glaucoma diagnostic billings were seen in males, females and rural and urban residents among policy-affected and policy-unaffected age groups. Ontarians living in the wealthiest neighbourhood areas also had a significantly reduced rate after versus before 2004: -2.7‰ (p < 0.0001) for the age group 20-39 years, -9.0‰ (p < 0.0001) for the age group 40-64 years, and -2.3‰ (p < 0.001) for the age group 65+ years. CONCLUSIONS: Discontinuation of government-funding for routine eye exams was associated with a significantly reduced rate of new glaucoma diagnostic billings irrespective of sociodemographics. More research is needed to understand the reduced glaucoma billings in unaffected seniors and those living in the wealthiest neighbourhood areas.


Subject(s)
Glaucoma , Child, Preschool , Female , Glaucoma/diagnosis , Glaucoma/epidemiology , Government , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Ontario/epidemiology , Physical Examination
17.
Can J Diabetes ; 46(1): 26-31, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34144907

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Our aim in this study was to describe screening outcomes and sociodemographic characteristics of patients in an urban tele-ophthalmology screening program for diabetic retinopathy (DR). METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted on adults with diabetes type 1 or type 2 enrolled in the Toronto Tele-Retinal Screening Program between September 2013 and March 2019. RESULTS: A total of 1,374 screenings were completed, of which 344 (25%) detected DR. Of all participants, 17% did not have provincial health coverage and 21% had never had an eye exam. Of the 587 patients who completed sociodemographic questionnaires, the majority (84%) were born outside of Canada, and only 62% preferred English as their spoken language. Forty percent reported a household income of <$25,000, with these participants having an increased likelihood of detectable DR (odds ratio [OR], 1.83; p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Participants with low income are more likely to screen positive for DR. Tele-ophthalmologic screening can be effective in an urban, culturally diverse and socioeconomically disadvantaged population.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Retinopathy , Ophthalmology , Telemedicine , Adult , Diabetic Retinopathy/diagnosis , Diabetic Retinopathy/epidemiology , Humans , Mass Screening , Prospective Studies
18.
Can J Diabetes ; 45(8): 725-733.e12, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33814308

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Diabetic retinopathy is a common microvascular complication that leads to vision loss. Despite national and international organizations developing guidelines for diabetic retinopathy screening, patients with diabetes remain unscreened. Our aim was to understand facilitators and barriers influencing diabetic retinopathy screening attendance and to examine factors that promote program success. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL from inception until September 23, 2019, were used for data collection. Studies were included if they were original qualitative research articles, included adults >18 years of age and assessed diabetic retinopathy screening programs or retinopathy screening as a component of a general diabetes care program. A "best-fit" framework synthesis methodology was used for this analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-nine articles involving 1,433 participants were identified. Six themes of barriers to, and facilitators of, diabetic retinopathy screening were identified, including access to screening, knowledge and information sharing, training and skills competency, service delivery, cultural competency and psychological factors. Cost and competing interests were common barriers to access; lack of knowledge about screening services was also a frequently reported barrier. Both patients and providers identified the need for improved service delivery, especially the referral and follow-up process. Providers recognized the need for additional training, patients enumerated several psychological barriers to screening uptake and cultural considerations were believed to be important, particularly among Indigenous communities. CONCLUSIONS: To improve screening uptake, the identified challenges must be addressed while also reinforcing the facilitators. Furthermore, program administrators could model new and unsuccessful screening programs after the successful ones while also considering local peculiarities.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Retinopathy , Adult , Diabetic Retinopathy/diagnosis , Diabetic Retinopathy/epidemiology , Humans , Mass Screening , Qualitative Research
19.
Diabet Med ; 38(4): e14429, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33068305

ABSTRACT

AIM: To identify barriers to/enablers of attendance at eye screening among three groups of immigrantsto Canada from cultural/linguistic minority groups living with diabetes. METHODS: Using a patient-oriented research approach leveraging Diabetes Action Canada's patient engagement platform, we interviewed a purposeful sample of people with type 2 diabetes who had immigrated to Canada from: Pakistan (interviews in Urdu), China (interviews in Mandarin) and French-speaking African and Caribbean nations (interviews in French). We collected and analysed data based on the Theoretical Domains Framework covering key modifiable factors that may operate as barriers to or enablers of attending eye screening. We used directed content analysis to code barrier/enabler domains. Barriers/enablers were mapped to behaviour change techniques to inform future intervention development. RESULTS: We interviewed 39 people (13 per group). Many barriers/enablers were consistent across groups, including views about harms caused by screening itself, practical appointment issues including forgetting, screening costs, wait times and making/getting to an appointment, lack of awareness about retinopathy screening, language barriers, and family and clinical support. Group-specific barriers/enablers included a preference to return to one's country of birth for screening, the impact of winter, and preferences for alternative medicine. CONCLUSION: Our results can inform linguistic and culturally competent interventions to support immigrants living with diabetes in attending eye screening to prevent avoidable blindness.


Subject(s)
Diabetic Retinopathy/diagnosis , Emigrants and Immigrants , Mass Screening , Minority Groups , Patient Participation , Adult , Aged , Canada/epidemiology , Communication Barriers , Culture , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/ethnology , Diabetic Retinopathy/ethnology , Emigrants and Immigrants/psychology , Emigrants and Immigrants/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Language , Male , Mass Screening/psychology , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Minority Groups/psychology , Minority Groups/statistics & numerical data , Patient Compliance/statistics & numerical data , Patient Participation/psychology , Patient Participation/statistics & numerical data , Socioeconomic Factors
20.
Can J Ophthalmol ; 56(4): 223-230, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33232680

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Diabetes is the leading cause of acquired blindness in Canadians under the age of 50 years, and diabetic retinopathy affects an estimated 500 000 Canadians. Early identification of retinopathy with screening eye examinations allows for secondary prevention. To understand the need for resource allotment in diabetic screening, we undertook a cross-sectional study of key demographics and geographics of screened and unscreened patients in Ontario. METHODS: Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) records were derived from physician and optometry billing, matched with patients aged >19 years with prevalent diabetes between 2011 and 2013. Data were cross-correlated with demographic covariates, including age, sex, income quintile, immigrant status, as well as geographic covariates such as rurality and patient Local Health Integration Network (LHIN). RESULTS: Of almost 1 146 000 patients included in the analysis, approximately 406 000 were unscreened. Of note, this included 234 000 adults aged 40-64 years. Approximately 818 000 patients with diabetes lived in large cities, and 301 000 (37%) were unscreened. When the City of Toronto was analyzed as an urban area with the highest density of unscreened prevalence, autocorrelation between the percentage of eye examinations among patients with diabetes aged >40 years and low-income revealed that large areas of Toronto Central correlated for low examination rates and low income. The majority (13/22) of Community Health Centres are present in these areas. CONCLUSIONS: Large cross-sectional population statistics for diabetes prevalence and ophthalmic examinations provides a geographic and socioeconomic profile for populations of middle-aged adults in large urban areas at risk for developing diabetic retinopathy and who might benefit from interventions to improve the rates of screening eye examinations.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Retinopathy , Optometry , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diabetic Retinopathy/diagnosis , Diabetic Retinopathy/epidemiology , Humans , Mass Screening , Middle Aged , Ontario/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...